Personal Injury Update: Key Legal Rulings

As July 2025 unfolds, a trio of high-impact rulings reframe who pays for injuries and how much control injured claimants have over their treatment and recovery. From vicarious liability and private medical costs to the reach of an employer’s duty of care—and direct insurer claims under the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010—these decisions shape strategies for plaintiffs and defendants alike. Legal practitioners and clients should consider these developments alongside major research platforms such as LexisNexis, Westlaw, Thomson Reuters, Bloomberg Law, and practitioner resources like FindLaw, Avvo, Nolo, Martindale-Hubbell, Law360 and Justia for commentary and analysis.

Personal Injury Update 2025: Key Rulings on Vicarious Liability and Private Treatment Costs

The latest judgments scrutinize whether employers bear duty beyond the end of a shift, when and how claimants may recover private treatment costs, and how insurers can be summoned directly under the 2010 Act. These decisions emphasize the balance between NHS/public systems and private care, and they stress the significance of evidence on probable future care choices in calculating damages.

Vicarious liability and recovery of private treatment costs: JD Wetherspoon Plc v Stephenus Bernadus Burger (21 May 2025)

This ruling tackled whether a defendant’s vicarious liability extended to injuries caused by two doormen hired through an independent contractor. The judgment delved into damages for anticipated private hip revision surgeries, considering that NHS options were available but that the claimant could opt for private treatment if circumstances suggested it was probable and beneficial. The court reaffirmed that, for future care expenses, the claimant’s probable use of private facilities is permissible where NHS care is not demonstrably preferable or readily available, while also acknowledging a right to self-fund when options exist. The appeal confirmed liability findings in the defendant’s favour on the broader issues, including causation.

Implication for damages: claimants may recover private-treatment costs if, on balance of probabilities, private care would be chosen despite NHS availability.
Mitigation principle: NHS waiting lists or private alternatives do not automatically bar recovery; the focus is on what will likely occur in the given future scenario.
Legal baseline: Section 2(4) of the Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act 1948 permits considering NHS options, but it does not negate a claimant’s right to private treatment when funded privately is feasible.

Further analysis and the decision summary are discussed in practitioner resources such as Court Injury coverage and related commentary from major legal outlets. For ongoing updates, see discussions on RICO damages and personal injury and truckers and liability rulings.

The extent of an employer’s duty of care: Pashamov v Taylor & Anor (30 April 2025)

The Pashamov decision clarifies that an employer’s duty of care may extend beyond the formal end of a shift, depending on risk assessments, managerial instructions, and how workers are transported or summoned for duty. Here, the claimant, exiting a company transport vehicle after shift completion, was injured by a third-party vehicle while crossing a roadway where the employer’s risk assessment anticipated responsibility for worker transport. The court held the employer liable, finding foreseeability of harm and breach of duty due to unsafe crossing conditions and departure from a designated pickup arrangement. Contributory negligence was assessed at 35% against the claimant.

Key takeaway: an employer’s duty of care can continue post-shift when management expectations and transport protocols create residual risk.
Liability split: the employer bears primary vicarious liability, with contributory negligence apportioned to the claimant where appropriate.
Policy angle: employers must ensure safe routes and clear pick-up points, even after official shifts conclude.

In-depth discussion and related cases are tracked by leading practitioners and databases, including coverage from LexisNexis and Westlaw summaries. See also practical analyses on the impact of employer duty in 2025 across practice areas at Ontario and related expert commentary and find more on insurer interactions with employer duties at Court Injury case notes.

For a broader legal framework and scholarly discussion about duty of care and employer responsibilities, consult major practice resources such as Thomson Reuters Practical Law, FindLaw, and Martindale-Hubbell, as well as policy-oriented analyses on Bloomberg Law and Law360. Readers may also explore comparative insights in Alberta and other jurisdictions for cross-border perspectives.

Direct claims under the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010: Makin v Protec Security Group Limited and QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited (11 April 2025)

This decision serves as a crucial reminder that an insurer may rely on the same policy defenses in direct claims under the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010 as it would if the claim were filed against its insured. The claimant sought damages after an injury sustained during ejection from a nightclub. Liability against the security company was established, but the insurer successfully resisted the claim due to late notification and breach of policy conditions. The court recognized that while a reasonable insured might not appraise immediate post-incident notification as necessary, once police inquiries began into staff accountability, the insurer should have been alerted. The relevant policy provisions, including circumstances surrounding incident reporting, were upheld as valid conditions precedent to liability.

Timing matters: late notification can defeat coverage under the 2010 Act, even where liability is established against the insured.
Policy defenses: standard policy conditions remain enforceable when a claimant seeks direct recovery from insurers.
Practical impact: practitioners should prioritize early, clear communications with insurers after any incident with potential claims.

Insights and practical commentary on direct insurer claims are available at RICO damages and personal injury implications, and a broader set of analyses across jurisdictions can be found via RICO-related developments. For ongoing litigation trends, see circuit-level harmonization.

Readers should also consider practical resources on insurer responses and damages from legal portals like Nolo, Justia, FindLaw, and Avvo. For a holistic view, see the linked practitioner materials and watch discussions on RICO damages and personal injury and related analyses.

Links for further reading and context in 2025 include:

For ongoing 2025 coverage, consult core resources and practitioner wikis, which often summarize these rulings alongside analysis from LexisNexis, Westlaw, Thomson Reuters, Bloomberg Law, and others. The cross-referenced cases and updates serve as a practical guide for litigants navigating vicarious liability, duty of care, and insurer liability in 2025.

FAQ

What is the practical impact of these 2025 rulings on private medical costs in personal injury claims? Claimants may recover private treatment costs if the balance of probabilities supports private care, even when NHS options exist, provided there is a reasonable basis for private treatment and proper evidence of future care needs.

Does an employer’s duty of care always end when a shift ends? No. The duty may extend past shift end if risk factors, management instructions, or transport arrangements keep workers exposed to foreseeable harm, as shown by Pashamov v Taylor.

Can insurers be sued directly under the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010 even after a liability finding against the insured? Yes, but insurers can rely on policy defenses, including late notification or other conditions precedent, to limit or defeat liability.

Where can I find more analysis on these topics? Look to case-specific analyses, RICO-related coverage, and practitioner summaries on cross-jurisdiction PI issues.

Share this post with a friend!